AI Services Market
AI Services Market › Use cases › Software & DevOps
Software & DevOpsDone with custom-built or unnamed agent Oct 19, 2026

Find errors in production agent traces

Laminar's flow-1 model reads agent traces to catch implicit failures like wrong clicks or wrong citations, so every production trace can be analyzed without sampling.

Find errors in production agent traces preview
What They Did
flow-1, a small open-source model fine-tuned and then trained with RL on synthetic investigations, runs inside a harness called Signals. It treats a trace like a repo with each span as a file, starts from a compressed trace plus a user prompt, greps spans, reads relevant ones in full, and returns findings as JSON in a user-defined schema.
How It Went
Laminar says it matches GPT-6-sol in detection quality on its own benchmark at 23x lower cost, making analysis of every trace affordable. Similar findings are clustered, though the benchmark is the vendor's own.
Worth Knowing
Signals accepts general prompts, such as checking whether a browser agent completed a checkout, and clusters of failures can seed eval datasets for fixing them. Laminar is Apache 2.0 and self-hostable.
Try it yourself with custom-built or unnamed agent

I have a folder of exported traces from my AI agent at [path to trace files]. Read through every trace and flag the ones with silent failures, such as wrong clicks, wrong citations, skipped steps, or answers that don't match the tool output. Finish with a table listing the trace ID, the failure type, and a one-line explanation for each flagged trace, plus a count of the most common failure patterns.

Read the original ↗