AI Services Market › Use cases › Software & DevOps
Software & DevOpsDone with custom-built or unnamed agent Oct 19, 2026
Find errors in production agent traces
Laminar's flow-1 model reads agent traces to catch implicit failures like wrong clicks or wrong citations, so every production trace can be analyzed without sampling.
- What They Did
- flow-1, a small open-source model fine-tuned and then trained with RL on synthetic investigations, runs inside a harness called Signals. It treats a trace like a repo with each span as a file, starts from a compressed trace plus a user prompt, greps spans, reads relevant ones in full, and returns findings as JSON in a user-defined schema.
- How It Went
- Laminar says it matches GPT-6-sol in detection quality on its own benchmark at 23x lower cost, making analysis of every trace affordable. Similar findings are clustered, though the benchmark is the vendor's own.
- Worth Knowing
- Signals accepts general prompts, such as checking whether a browser agent completed a checkout, and clusters of failures can seed eval datasets for fixing them. Laminar is Apache 2.0 and self-hostable.
Try it yourself with custom-built or unnamed agent
I have a folder of exported traces from my AI agent at [path to trace files]. Read through every trace and flag the ones with silent failures, such as wrong clicks, wrong citations, skipped steps, or answers that don't match the tool output. Finish with a table listing the trace ID, the failure type, and a one-line explanation for each flagged trace, plus a count of the most common failure patterns.