AI Services Market
AI Services Market › Fabbrica delle skill › Documenti › Incident Disclosure Communicator
$4.99 · Nessun login necessariov1.0.0– visualizzazioni

Incident Disclosure Communicator

Trasforma una timeline di disclosure di vulnerabilità in un advisory chiaro su cui i tuoi utenti possono davvero agire.

Un workflow basato su template per scrivere advisory di sicurezza — timeline, ambito interessato, impatto e azioni utente — usando l'arco di disclosure di CVE-2026-98432 (CVE pubblicato il 15 ottobre, escalation Red Hat il 30 ottobre, fix RHEL il 1° novembre) come timeline di riferimento.

Anteprima di Incident Disclosure Communicator
Ideale per
Redattori di documentazione, developer relations, founder e chiunque debba informare gli utenti di un problema di sicurezza.
Tempo necessario
Circa 45-60 minuti per advisory, una volta raccolti i fatti.
Livello
Intermedio

Installala in 3 passaggi

Nessuna registrazione. Nessuno strumento da riga di comando. Scegli la tua AI, copia una riga e incollala.

Pro — tutte le 531 skill

Preferisci fare da te? Acquista la skill ($4.99), scarica lo ZIP dalla conferma d'acquisto, decomprimilo nella cartella mostrata sopra e riavvia la sessione della tua AI — stesso risultato. L'hai già acquistata? Il tuo assistente AI può scaricarla per te.

Cosa contiene

Un file SKILL.md (la guida operativa) + un modello di partenza. Un'anteprima:

Incident Disclosure Communicator

The idea in one paragraph

Most security advisories fail in the same way: they bury the timeline, hedge the affected scope, and leave users guessing what to do before lunch. Good disclosure communication is a writing discipline, not a PR exercise. This skill walks you through assembling a verified timeline, stating exactly who is affected, describing impact without hype, and giving users a short list of actions ordered by urgency. The reference case is CVE-2026-98432: a kernel CVE published October 15, escalated by Red Hat to Critical on October 30 with an interim nftables rule, and followed by RHEL fixes on November 1 — while Ubuntu remained listed as vulnerable. That arc shows what users need at each stage: what happened, whether it touches them, and what to do right now.

What it is built on

Only verified facts from the public record are used as the reference timeline:

  • The kernel team published CVE-2026-98432 on October 15 (fix written by Eric Dumazet on October 1, flaw reported by researcher Xinyang Ge).
  • Fixed kernels (5.10.272, 5.15.223, 6.1.190, 6.6.159, 6.12.113, 6.18.56, 7.2.10, 7.3) were released between October 11 and October 18.
  • Red Hat raised the severity to Critical on October 30, published an nftables interim filtering rule, and pushed RHEL 8/9/10 fixes on November 1.
  • Ubuntu was still listed as "Vulnerable" as of November 1; Debian, Oracle, Amazon, and SUSE were partially patched.
  • As of November 1 there was no confirmed exploitation in the wild, and the CVE was not in CISA KEV.
  • Per Anthropic's October 27 blog post, an unreleased research model had written a working remote-root exploit (53 minutes, no credentials), which is why prompt, clear communication mattered even before any wild exploitation.

Workflow

  1. Assemble the verified timeline (input: vendor advisories, CVE record, distro notices -> output: dated timeline with sources). Collect every date from primary sources only: when the flaw was reported, when the fix was written, when the CVE was published, when each distro acted. For the reference case that means October 1 (fix), October 11-18 (fixed kernels), October 15 (CVE published), October 27 (Anthropic blog post), October 30 (Red Hat escalation and interim rule), November 1 (RHEL fixes; Ubuntu still vulnerable). Every entry gets its source link. If a date is unconfirmed, mark it as such instead of smoothing the story.
  2. Define the affected scope in plain terms (input: timeline plus technical details -> output: "you are affected if" checklist). Translate the technical scope into conditions a user can check in a minute: kernel since 4.4 without the fix, specific distro releases and their patch states, configurations that widen exposure (such as MPTCP listeners, which Go 1.24+ enables by default). Name who is not affected too — that sentence saves your support queue.
  3. Write the user action section first (input: scope checklist -> output: ordered action list). Before drafting the narrative, write what users should do, in order: check their kernel version, check their distro advisory, apply the patch or the interim mitigation, verify afterward. Each action gets the exact command or link. If no fix exists yet for some users, say so and give them the interim step plus when to check back.
  4. Draft, review, and publish (input: timeline, scope, actions -> output: published advisory plus update log). Write the advisory in this order: what happened (two sentences), who is affected (the checklist), what to do (the action list), then the timeline and links. Have someone technical review it for accuracy and someone non-technical review it for clarity. Publish with a visible "last updated" stamp, and log every revision — advisories are living documents while patches roll out.

Anteprima del modello

Incident Disclosure Advisory Worksheet

Draft the advisory here, then publish. Keep every source link.

1. Verified timeline

Reference arc (CVE-2026-98432): Oct 1 fix written / Oct 11-18 fixed kernels released / Oct 15 CVE published / Oct 27 research-model exploit disclosed / Oct 30 Red Hat escalation + interim rule / Nov 1 RHEL fixes, Ubuntu still vulnerable.

2. Affected scope — "you are affected if" checklist

  • [ ] Condition a user can check in a minute:
  • [ ] Condition a user can check in a minute:
  • [ ] Condition a user can check in a minute:

Who is NOT affected (write this sentence; it saves the support queue):

3. User actions, in order

Il pacchetto della skill (SKILL.md + modello) è scritto in inglese.

Pro — tutte le 531 skill

Potrebbe piacerti anche