AI Services Market
AI Services Market › Skill-Fabrik › Sonstige › AI-Use Disclosure Playbook
$4.99 · Ohne Anmeldungv1.0.0– Aufrufe

AI-Use Disclosure Playbook

Sagen Sie, dass Sie KI nutzen, ohne einen Brand auszulösen

Legen Sie die KI-Nutzung in kreativer Produktion offen: Inventarisieren Sie, was Sie tatsächlich nutzen, segmentieren Sie Spieler/Presse/Partner, schreiben Sie die Erklärung, timen Sie die Veröffentlichung, triagieren Sie die Stimmung in 48 Stunden und begrenzen Sie das Szenario des unverblümten Geschäftsführers.

AI-Use Disclosure Playbook Vorschau
Am besten für
Studio-Leitungen, Comms, Produzenten
Zeitaufwand
~2 Stunden zum Entwerfen
Stufe
Mittelstufe

In 3 Schritten installieren

Keine Anmeldung. Keine CLI-Tools. Wählen Sie Ihre AI, kopieren Sie eine Zeile und fügen Sie sie ein.

Pro — alle 511 Skills

Lieber selbst machen? Kaufen Sie den Skill ($4.99), laden Sie die ZIP-Datei aus Ihrer Kaufbestätigung herunter, entpacken Sie sie in das oben angezeigte Verzeichnis und starten Sie Ihre AI-Sitzung neu — gleiches Ergebnis. Haben Sie ihn schon gekauft? Ihr AI-Assistent kann ihn für Sie herunterladen.

Was ist enthalten

Eine SKILL.md (die Anleitung) + eine Startvorlage. Eine Vorschau:

AI-Use Disclosure Playbook

When to use

  • Your studio uses AI tools and players, press, or platform holders are asking — or will ask.
  • You're about to announce, ship, or patch something AI-assisted and want the disclosure to land as honesty, not confession.
  • A team member (or executive) already said something blunt about AI in public and you need to manage the fallout.
  • You're writing the studio's standing policy so the next disclosure isn't improvised.

Workflow

  1. Map what you actually use (input: production reality → output: AI-use inventory)
    List every AI touchpoint honestly: code assistance, concept art exploration, localization drafts, QA bots, voice synthesis, marketing copy, community moderation. For each: which tool, at what stage, and — critically — what a human did after (reviewed, rewrote, approved, discarded). "AI-assisted with human approval" and "AI-generated, shipped as-is" are different disclosures; most backlash comes from blurring them.
  2. Segment your audiences (input: inventory → output: audience map)
    Three audiences, three anxieties: players (fear: slop replacing craft, training-data ethics, job losses), press (fear: being misled; they will find the AI use anyway), platform holders/partners (fear: legal and content-policy exposure). Write one sentence per audience: what they need to hear to keep trusting you.
  3. Write the disclosure (input: inventory + audience map → output: disclosure statement)
    Structure: what was used, where in the pipeline, what humans did, and what it changed for the player (faster patches? more localization languages? nothing visible?). Lead with the human work, not the AI: "Our artists explored 200 AI-generated concepts, painted the final 40 by hand" beats "We use AI in art." Never claim more human involvement than happened — the internet fact-checks.
  4. Choose the venue and timing (input: statement → output: release plan)
    Disclose in your own channel first (dev blog, patch notes, store page section) — never let a data-mine, a leak, or a blunt executive thread be the reveal. Time it with something players like (a content drop, a free weekend), not buried in a Friday-night post. Prepare the FAQ before you publish: the five hardest questions, answered in your voice.
  5. Triage the sentiment (input: launch → output: sentiment log)
    In the first 48 hours, sort reactions into: legitimate craft concerns (engage — these people might be right), training-data/job anxieties (acknowledge the industry problem honestly, state your studio's actual practice), bad-faith pile-ons (don't feed), and press inquiries (one spokesperson, written answers, no improv). Log volume and tone per bucket; decide at 48 hours whether a follow-up post is needed or silence is.
  6. Handle the blunt-executive scenario (input: crisis → output: containment plan)
    If someone already posted the provocative version ("developers who refuse AI shouldn't be in business"): don't delete-and-pretend unless the account itself is the problem — deletion reads as discipline either way. Separate the person from the policy within 24 hours ("those were personal views; here's our actual practice"), publish the real inventory from step 1, and put the human-in-the-loop line in writing: what judgment stays human, no exceptions.

Vorschau der Startvorlage

AI-Use Disclosure Worksheet

Fill in before anyone asks — because someone will.

1. AI-use inventory (honest version)

2. Audience map

  • Players fear ___. They need to hear ___.
  • Press fears ___. They need to hear ___.
  • Partners/platforms fear ___. They need to hear ___.

3. Disclosure statement (your words)

What was used / where in the pipeline / what humans did / what changed for the player:

Lead with the human work.

4. Release plan

  • Own channel (dev blog / patch notes / store page):
  • Timing (paired with what players like):
  • Pre-written FAQ (the 5 hardest questions):

5. Sentiment triage (first 48h)

Follow-up post needed, or silence? Decide at 48h:

Das Skill-Paket selbst (SKILL.md + Vorlage) ist auf Englisch verfasst.

Pro — alle 511 Skills

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen