AI Services Market
AI Services Market › スキルファクトリー › ワークフロー › Grading Assistant
$4.99 · サインイン不要v1.0.0– 回表示

Grading Assistant

あなたのルーブリックで採点し、生徒一人ひとりにフィードバックを書きます

AIがあなたのルーブリックに沿ってレポートを採点し、生徒一人ひとりに合わせたフィードバックを作成します。さらに、よくある間違いから復習教材も生成します。エッセイに埋もれながらも、全生徒に役立つフィードバックを届けたい教師のために。

Grading Assistant のプレビュー
こんな方におすすめ
教師、家庭教師
所要時間
1コースあたり初期設定 約20分
レベル
初心者向け

3ステップでインストール

登録不要。CLIツールも不要です。お使いのAIを選んで、1行コピーして貼るだけです。

Pro — 全511件のスキル

ご自分で入れたい場合は、スキルを購入($4.99)し、購入完了画面からZIPをダウンロードして、上のディレクトリに展開し、AIのセッションを再起動してください。結果は同じです。すでに購入済みの場合は、AIアシスタントにダウンロードしてもらうこともできます。

実際の活用事例

実際のユーザーがAIエージェントで、まさにこの仕事をやり遂げた事例です。

パックの内容

SKILL.md(手順書)1点とスターターテンプレート1点が入っています。プレビューはこちらです:

Grading Assistant

When to use

  • You have 30+ essays to grade against a rubric and the weekend is disappearing
  • Every student should get real feedback, not a score and a "good job"
  • You want to spot what the whole class got wrong and turn it into next week's review
  • You teach the same course across sections and need grading to stay consistent
  • You need lesson plans or review slides built from actual student mistakes, not your memory of them

Workflow

  1. Build the grading project (input: syllabus, rubric, sample answers → output: per-course project)
    Set up one AI project per course and feed it the syllabus, your rubric, past exams, model answers, and course materials. One real case keeps a separate project per course so the grading stays anchored to that course's standards. A rubric written for a colleague, not for yourself, is the bar — the AI grades what it says, not what you meant.
  2. Anonymize the submissions (input: student work → output: numbered, ID-free batch)
    Strip names before grading: student papers get anonymous numbers. This keeps the grading honest and protects student privacy. Feed readable digital files — scans need to be legible or the grading degrades silently.
  3. Grade criterion by criterion (input: rubric + submissions → output: scored batch + flagged borderlines)
    The AI scores each submission against every rubric criterion separately, with a short justification per criterion. It doesn't invent the rubric as it goes — every score points at a criterion. Borderline and low-confidence grades get flagged for your review; the easy agreements flow through.
  4. Write real feedback (input: graded batch → output: per-student feedback)
    Each student gets personalized comments: what they did well (citing their actual words), what cost them points (citing the criterion), and one concrete thing to fix next time. A feedback comment that could apply to any student applies to none of them — send it back.
  5. Mine the mistakes for teaching (input: full batch results → output: class trends + review materials)
    Aggregate the criterion scores across the class to find the hot spots: the two rubric rows where everyone bled points. Turn those into next week's review — slides or a lesson plan built from the actual wrong answers, not from what you remember being hard. Never touch the original submission files; scores live in a separate sheet.
  6. You set the final grades (input: scored batch → output: confirmed grades)
    Review the flagged borderlines, spot-check a handful, then approve. The AI proposes; you dispose. Educational responsibility doesn't delegate — final grades are always the teacher's call.

Output spec

テンプレートのプレビュー

Grading Assistant — Rubric & Batch Template

One project per course. Anonymize first, grade second, approve last.

Course project

  • Course: {name / term}
  • Fed to the AI: [ ] syllabus [ ] rubric [ ] past exams [ ] model answers [ ] course materials
  • Submissions format: {digital docs / legible scans}

The rubric (written for a colleague, not for yourself)

Grading scale: {e.g. A ≥ 90, B ≥ 80 …} | Late policy: {…} | Academic integrity notes: {…}

Batch tracking

Student feedback format (one per student)

Feedback — Student {anonymous #}

  • What worked: {quote their actual words — "…"}

スキルパック本体(SKILL.md とテンプレート)は英語で書かれています。

Pro — 全511件のスキル

こちらもおすすめです