Shared Context Conflict
Due lati, uno slot, un tiro alla fune da guardare
Trasforma la tua AI in un regista di motion graphics per il pattern «conflitto nel contesto condiviso» — mette due elementi in un unico fotogramma condiviso a contendersi lo stesso slot e ne anima la collisione, così un compromesso o uno scontro si legge come un tiro alla fune fisico invece che come un punto di elenco.
Installala in 3 passaggi
Nessuna registrazione. Nessuno strumento da riga di comando. Scegli la tua AI, copia una riga e incollala.
Preferisci fare da te? Acquista la skill ($4.99), scarica lo ZIP dalla conferma d'acquisto, decomprimilo nella cartella mostrata sopra e riavvia la sessione della tua AI — stesso risultato. L'hai già acquistata? Il tuo assistente AI può scaricarla per te.
Cosa contiene
Un file SKILL.md (la guida operativa) + un modello di partenza. Un'anteprima:
Shared Context Conflict
When to use
- A video explains a trade-off (speed vs quality, price vs features) and wants the tension felt, not just stated
- A comparison stages two options fighting for the same budget, screen space, or calendar slot
- A story beat shows two characters, teams, or ideas colliding over one decision
- A product video shows the old workflow and the new workflow competing for the same job
- A debate segment gives each side one shared stage instead of two separate talking heads
Workflow
- Define the shared context (input: two competing elements → output: one shared frame)
Name the single thing both sides want: one budget line, one screen slot, one headline, one afternoon, one job. Draw that shared context as one container — a single box, slot, timeline block, or stage — dead centre, taking ~40–50% of frame width. Both elements must visibly want the same container; if each side gets its own box, there is no conflict, just a comparison. Label the container in ≤4 words ("This week's budget", "The hero slot", "Friday 3pm"). One container, two claimants, zero ambiguity about what is at stake. - Introduce the claimants (input: two elements → output: opposing entry)
Bring the two elements in from opposite sides over 0.6–0.8s, ease-out: Side A from the left, Side B from the right, each stopping just outside the container's edge with a 4–6% gap. Give each a distinct identity — different colour (one cool, one warm, both desaturated to ~70% so neither screams), a short label (≤3 words), and one icon or word that stands for its claim. Equal size, equal weight: the audience must not be able to tell who wins from the entrance. Hold 0.5s with both sides flanking the container — the standoff is the setup. - Stage the collision (input: standoff → output: conflict animation)
Animate the conflict over 1.2–1.8s in three micro-beats: (a) both elements push inward toward the container at once (translate 4–6% of frame width, 0.3s, ease-in) and stop short — the near-miss; (b) they recoil to their start positions (0.25s, ease-out) — the bounce-back; (c) the stronger side pushes in again, this time crossing into the container's edge and compressing the other side back by ~8% (0.5s, ease-in-out). Add a 2–3px shake to the container on the final push (two quick ±2px jolts, 0.15s total) and a brief impact accent — a 0.1s white flash at 15% opacity at the contact point, or a single low thud if the video has sound. The loser must visibly give ground: if nothing yields, there was no conflict, just choreography. - Resolve or stalemate (input: collision → output: outcome frame)
Pick the outcome before animating — the animation serves the verdict, not the other way round. Resolution: the winning element settles inside the container at full colour, the loser fades to 40% and slides back to its start position over 0.5s, ease-out. Stalemate: both elements split the container (each takes half, with a visible divider line drawing down the middle over 0.3s) and both drop to 80% brightness — the shared context survives, split. Either way, hold the outcome 1.5–2.5s with a one-line verdict (≤8 words: "Speed wins this round", "Split: mornings for focus, afternoons for calls") fading in below the container over 0.4s. - Exit clean (input: outcome frame → output: clean exit)
Exit by fading the whole composition out over 0.4s, or by zooming into the winning element (or the split container) as the next scene's opener. If the video returns to this conflict later (a recurring trade-off), keep the same container, colours, and side assignments every time — swapping sides between rounds confuses the audience about who is who.
Anteprima del modello
Shared Context Conflict — Template
One container, two claimants, one outcome.
The shared context (one container, ≤4-word label)
Container label: {e.g. "This week's budget" / "The hero slot" / "Friday 3pm"} Container width: ~40–50% of frame, dead centre What is at stake (one line): {what both sides want}
The claimants (equal size, equal weight)
Entry: opposite sides over {0.6–0.8}s, ease-out, stop {4–6}% outside container Standoff hold: 0.5s
Collision (1.2–1.8s)
Impact: container shake ±2px × 2 (0.15s) + {flash 0.1s at 15% / single low thud / none}
Outcome (pick one)
Il pacchetto della skill (SKILL.md + modello) è scritto in inglese.
